A third scenario

Because of the destructive nature of activism, I recommend taking on activists in only two scenarios: when the CEO is the founder of the company, or if the company’s very survival is at stake.

Oil-giant Chevron has been battling with activists and lawyers for several years over environmental damage in the Ecuadorean Amazon. Recently, the corporation has been fighting back against a $9.5 billion judgment related to the pollution claims.

Chevron decided to pursue a scorched-earth campaign against the plaintiffs’ attorneys and their allies, and has succeeded not only in blocking the collection of the verdict, but also in gaining permission to sue a prominent law firm for its role in the litigation. Chevron appears vindicated in its claims of corruption and fraud surrounding the activist campaign and associated litigation.

So I would like to add a third scenario where a corporate counter-campaign of litigation and retaliation is recommended: when your company is number three or higher on the Fortune 500 list, with over $230 billion in revenues and annual earnings north of $26 billion.

Otherwise, don’t try this at home.

One Response to A third scenario

  1. […] After seeing the success Chevron had in 2014 in its legal battle against activists, I added a third scenario for corporate pushback: “when your company is number three or higher on the Fortune 500 list, […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: